The Network Garden - Mark Sigal's Blog

Digital media, being an entrepreneur, intelligent investing and other interesting nuggets

About

My Photo
View Mark Sigal's profile on LinkedIn
See how we're connected

WHAT HAVE I BUILT?

ASK ABOUT THE 9 TRUTHS

JOLLY & ROGER'S EBOOK VIDEO TRAILER

Chatopic Book Series

  • Chris Anderson: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution

    Chris Anderson: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution

  • Clayton M. Christensen: How Will You Measure Your Life?

    Clayton M. Christensen: How Will You Measure Your Life?

  • Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow

    Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow

  • Phil Lapsley: Exploding the Phone: The Untold Story of the Teenagers and Outlaws who Hacked Ma Bell

    Phil Lapsley: Exploding the Phone: The Untold Story of the Teenagers and Outlaws who Hacked Ma Bell

  • Rachel Maddow: Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power

    Rachel Maddow: Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power

  • Daniel H. Pink: A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future

    Daniel H. Pink: A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future

  • Susan Cain: Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking

    Susan Cain: Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking

  • Patricia S. Churchland: Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality

    Patricia S. Churchland: Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality

  • Daniel Imhoff: Food Fight: The Citizen's Guide to the Next Food and Farm Bill

    Daniel Imhoff: Food Fight: The Citizen's Guide to the Next Food and Farm Bill

Categories

  • Advertising (4)
  • Amazon (28)
  • Android (29)
  • Apple (72)
  • Basketball (2)
  • Books (21)
  • Branding (4)
  • Coaching (155)
  • Current Affairs (61)
  • Design (11)
  • Digital Media (261)
  • Economy (14)
  • Education (4)
  • Entertainment (6)
  • Facebook (3)
  • Film (6)
  • Games (3)
  • Google (26)
  • Humor (9)
  • Ideation (164)
  • Information Management (56)
  • Investing (197)
  • iOS (47)
  • Local (1)
  • Marketing (5)
  • Media (10)
  • Metrics (16)
  • Mobile (39)
  • Music (2)
  • Pattern Recognition (98)
  • People Connections (8)
  • Policy (6)
  • Politics (4)
  • Post-PC (65)
  • Religion (1)
  • Retailing (7)
  • San Francisco (1)
  • Spirit (23)
  • Sports (22)
  • Streams and Nuggets (424)
  • Television (9)
  • Travel (2)
  • Values (3)
  • Weblogs (1)
See More

Grab my RSS feed

Two Thoughts on 'The Hardware Revolution Is Upon Us And Why It Matters'

Hardware-is-HARD

Jon Callaghan of True Ventures has written an excellent article where he argues that a new hardware revolution is upon us, and that it is destined to be a game-changer. It's a great piece, and well worth a read. 

Here is an excerpt:

Almost exactly six years ago, Apple launched the first iPhone. It was a small device that many dismissed as a toy. In reality Steve put a supercomputer in our pocket — we just didn’t know it. And like super computers before, it came with immense capabilities and brought about an opportunity to rethink, reimagine and reinvent how we live, work, create and consume. Today, smartphones (and tablet devices) sell by the hundreds of millions.

Cheap processors, cheaper memory, and even cheaper sensors means it’s a great time for people who like to tinker with hardware to tinker. Platforms like Kickstarter and Quirky de-risk production, identify features and customers, and do so before the first tool is made. Wireless broadband is ubiquitous, and military grade technology is available at RadioShack. The manufacture and design of products and devices has changed forever. Building factories is no longer a prerequisite for building products. Add to the mix emergent technologies such as 3D printing and inexpensive laser cutters that put prototyping capabilities onto a kitchen table, and we suddenly are facing an extraordinary revolution in hardware-based innovation.

I wholeheartedly agree with his assertions, but I do want to put a bow around one of Jon's most salient points; namely, that building hardware is hard. Make that HARD with capital letters.

Specifically, there are two key 'gotchas' about the hardware business that most aspiring entrepreneurs get blindsided by.

Before I get into them, let me establish my "hardware chops." In my career, I have:

  • Hand-built my own hardware systems (CafeNet: Internet access terminals)
  • Worked in the network hardware business (Tribe Communications: Internet infrastructure)
  • Invested in hardware startups (Whistle Communications: Internet appliances)
  • Advised hardware startups (Square Connect: Universal remote control gateways)
  • Founded a hardware device management software company (Rapid Logic: unified device management tools)
  • Built a cross-platform system for creating native mobile apps (Unicorn Labs) 

In other words, my take is based upon a 360-degree perspective on the hardware business, and it's lifecycle from a make, bake and take to market perspective. 

So why hardware is so...HARD?

One is the simple truth that hardware guys speak a different language and come from a different planet than software guys, and vice versa.

This generally translates into each party trying to abstract out the other, which often leads to lowest common denominator solutions, or worse, products where the target user credulously wonders, "Were these things designed to work TOGETHER, or just to irritate the user?"

The next wave implies developers having a sense of there being one composite whole (hardware, software, service, tools, manageability), and the team, culture and ecosystem being oriented accordingly. One can see this dynamic at work in Apple's iOS vs. Google's Android.

Two is that specifically because you are dealing with physical devices (as opposed to the wholly digital 1s and 0s of software), the question of channels for discovery, selling, distribution and support are inordinately more complex, with many more points of failure, than with software alone.

This underscores an indelible truth about indirect channels (like retail, amazon, etc.) that many fail to grok; namely, that the channel can NOT solve your selling and support challenges until YOU figure them out first. It's like trying to tell the blind how to see when you can't see yourself.

Food for thought.

Related:

  1. Three Takeaways from the WWDC Keynote: How Apple Got its Groove Back
  2. Six Takeaways from the Google IO Keynote
  3. Ruminations on The Mobile Native Cloud: An Extensible Computing Model for Post - PC
  4. Innovation, Inevitability and Why R&D is So Hard



 

August 02, 2013 in Android, Apple, Coaching, Design, Google, iOS, Media, Mobile, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Why Netflix is betting on Apps over Channels: It's All About Being 'Native'

Netflix

"Look at the bigger picture." 
- Francis Underwood, House of Cards

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings has written an 11-page essay that's embedded below. It's quite excellent, and lays out his vision for the future of Internet TV (Peter Kafka of AllThingsD has a crisp summary of the key bullet points HERE). 

In particular, it underscores why Hastings' Netflix deserves to be mentioned in the same reverential tones as Apple, Amazon and Google.

For one, there is the clear articulation of a 'North Star' that guides the company forward; namely, winning more of their members 'moments of truth' - i.e., those times when a consumer could play a game, read a book, chat on the phone or watch conventional TV, but chooses Netflix instead.

The virtue of having a North Star is that it instructs clear narrative-driven thinking, tightening focus, process and execution. It is one reason that we readily associate Apple, Amazon and Google as the gold standard companies of their industry, and so few others.

It's also one reason that it almost feels inevitable that at some point, Google (4.3% of their market cap), Apple (2.8% of their market cap) or Amazon (10.3% of their market cap) will **need** to acquire Netflix (I'd add Disney as a dark horse candidate).

After all, TV viewing captures a billion hours a day of consumers' time, and Netflix has created a model whereby 30 million of these consumers are paying a monthly subscription fee for access to the service.

In other words, despite all of the various activities that fight for consumers attention, Netflix is winning at: A) securing members; B) monetizing those members; and C) growing their base through differentiation. 

Talk about **earned attention.**

Netflix is Betting BIG on Apps

Netflix_CompanyFacts

It is with that backdrop that I took particular interest in Hastings' assertion that Apps -- not streams -- but Apps --will replace Channels as the primary construct for delivering Internet TV. He mentioned the term 25 times in the document, no less.

I think that there are two things that one needs to keep in mind relative to the "apps" versus "channels" topic. 

One is that a channel is simply a payload, and an app is simply a wrapper for delivering that payload.

It's no different in that context from saying that Apple turned the phone into an app. We don't need to think about it in that context because the phone app does what a phone is supposed to do.

Quite the contrary. We now think of the iPhone as much more than a phone, right?

Two, is the unlike a simple envelope, the wrapper of an app can actually enable to DO stuff; namely, show you related content, extend the context with communications, enable you to share the content, rate it, excerpt it, roll it into a play list, etc.

The point is that an app can do things that a simple stream can not, and Hastings clearly groks that this is about delivering **native experiences.**

This is also why a show like 'House of Cards' launched with the entire Season 1. In Netflix, binge viewing is a native behavior, right?

Along these lines, Hastings specifically dispels the idea of Netflix even having a fixed notion of what constitutes a 'season' in their model.

It's all about being native, something that I have written extensively about, most recently HERE.

Related:

  1. Apple’s North Star vs. Earth’s Gravity: Four Takeaways from Apple’s Earnings Call
  2. Built-to-Thrive - The Standard Bearers: Apple, Google, Amazon
  3. Mobile 'native' publishing: Why our concept of content must evolve in the post-PC era

Netflix Ir Letter

May 03, 2013 in Amazon, Apple, Digital Media, Entertainment, Media, Mobile, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets, Television | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Mobile 'native' publishing: Why our concept of content must evolve in the post-PC era (O'Reilly @TOC)

Early-TalkieOne reason that industry disruptions prove so vexing to market leaders is that disruptive waves simultaneously barrel through assumptions about customer needs, industry economics and operational best practices.

Consider the case of the motion picture business, an industry that was disrupted when the “talkie” — once derided as a costly gimmick — subsumed the silent picture in the 1920s.

The takeaway from the film industry’s transition is instructive. The talkie not only changed how movies were made and the economics of the business itself, but critically, it changed our concept of what a movie could be.

In doing so, it transformed the medium forever (The Speed of Sound by Scott Eyman is an excellent book on this topic).

Disrupted by digital

As we move toward a post-PC universe of 10 billion mobile devices, a similar disruption is playing out in the publishing business.

Print media is patient zero in the ongoing saga of “disrupted by digital,” an unstoppable force that has decimated one time toll road businesses like newspapers, and is threatening to squeeze out the last breaths of magazine and book publishers.

That this occurs at a time when physical bookstores are also under assault is hardly a coincidence given the tight links between publishers and bookstores on book distribution, discovery and monetization. The brutal reality is that when an industry is disrupted, the entire ecosystem feels the pain.

The rise of dynamic content services

So if publishing must evolve, what does this mean for publishers?

Most basically, it suggests that whereas static text and pictures define our current concept of publishing, in the mobile era, we need to think about what is being “published” as a native app that re-configures itself based upon the content being served. Logically, this type of system autonomously generates data.

This has significant ramifications for how such content is made, what it can do, and the underlying systems required for delivering and receiving the same.

DCS-model2

Read the full piece at O'Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing by clicking HERE.

Related:

  1. You say you want a revolution? It’s called post-PC computing (O'Reilly Radar)
  2. Rebooting the Book: One iPad at a Time (O'Reilly Radar)
  3. Anatomy of an eBook App: Lessons learned building a Top 20 eBook App (O'Reilly Radar)

 

March 25, 2013 in Advertising, Design, Digital Media, iOS, Marketing, Media, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Pattern Recognition: Passbook is Apple's eWallet; Fragility; TV Business Collapse

My goal is to write one 'Pattern Recognition' a week. Just the top 3-4 stories that stayed under my skin. Here's what stuck this week:
  1. Passbook is Apple's eWallet: In my analysis of Apple's forthcoming iOS 6 (part of my WWDC Keynote article), I saved my biggest WOW! for Passbook, noting that while Apple presented it as a consolidated place to organize things like gift cards, flight itineraries, movie tickets and the like, I believe that it's the true beginning of Apple’s foray into being the defacto eWallet. Happily, I stumbled upon this exceptional Quora thread about Passbook. Definitely worth a read, as I believe Passbook is a game changer. Excerpt: "Apple has entered into the mobile wallet marketplace by sticking just a toe in the ocean of mobile payments. In the process, Apple will change just about all aspects of discounts, ticketing and payments."
  2. Fragility - How to Detect Who Will Go Bust: Nassim Nicholas Taleb is unquestionably one of my favorite writers/thinkers. Fooled by Randomness provided intellectual framing for comprehending how biases cloud our judgement, and how we frequently misfactor the role of chance. It also introduced the concept of Black Swan events into our lexicon (although Fooled by Randomness is a better read than Black Swan). His newest book is called Antifragile, and in it he espouses a methodology for figuring out if our miscalculations or misforecasts are more harmful one way or the other (than they are beneficial), and how accelerating the damage is. This article provides a nice overview. Anything pertaining to risk mitigation is a worthy ounce of prevention in these turbulent times.
  3. Is the TV Business Starting to Collapse? I've read many arguments that TV programming is destined to go ala carte and unbundled, breaking the stranglehold that the cable, satellite and broadcast providers hold on consumers. This piece by Henry Blodget does an excellent job of detailing the many reasons this could happen, but I just don't see it happening any time SOON. Someday, sure, but not in the next 5-10 years, I believe. Why do I say this? One, is that the affilate fees that the cable companies pay to the content providers (e.g., ESPN, Bravo, TNT) are the consummate golden handcuffs. The day that ESPN wants to go ala carte is the day that Comcast can stop paying ESPN $4.69 per household per month. Plus, there is the factor of the selfish gene at work; namely, even if the content creators and network operators saw the wisdom of embracing new models, the individuals in power seats have a vested interest in protecting their fiefdoms, something that I blogged about HERE. "Not on my watch," is the unspoken operating logic here. How about Apple? Won't their rumored TV disrupt the business? First off, I believe that they are a more likely set-top box play than a TV maker, but more to the point, when Apple built the iPod, they worked through the record labels, didn't replace them. When they launched iPhone, they worked through the carriers, didn't replace them. I think the same equation will play here. Two related takes on this story. One is that our thirst for live sports (and perhaps, live content in general) is insatiable. It's why ESPN is ESPN, and why ESPN is the true profit center for Disney. Two is that original programming becomes the differentiator for long-term success. It's the reason that HBO can command the fees it does, and maintain high subscriber retention. It's why people care about AMC (Mad Men, Breaking Bad), and it's why TBS/TNT is no longer the place that syndicated shows go to die (although they do plenty of that, too).One other moral of the story is that creating this TV programming that viewers are loyal to is A LOT harder to produce, distribute and market than news content, which is why blogs could kills newspapers, but YouTube hasn't killed the networks. When someone figures out a different format or production methodology that changes the equation, look out.

June 15, 2012 in Apple, Investing, Media, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets, Television | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Best Kids' Book Apps of 2011 - Spot the Dot makes the grade (Unicorn Labs produced)

Kirkus3

(via Kirkus Book Reviews)

Related:

  1. Unicorn Labs produced 'Spot the Dot' featured in NYT article: Finding Good Apps for Children With Autism
  2. The Five Keys to a Successful eBook Production: The Story of Spot the Dot
  3. Kirkus Reviews gives Spot the Dot a Kirkus Star as a Book of Remarkable Merit
  4. Jolly and Roger's Misguided Adventures is Ansca Mobile's App of the Month

December 19, 2011 in Books, iOS, Media, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Jolly and Roger's Misguided Adventures: Quest for the Dragon Tear (Children's interactive ebook for iPad)

Jolly-4Panel

Jolly and Roger's Misguided Adventures: Quest for the Dragon Tear is now LIVE in the App Store. 

This interactive children's ebook for iPad was produced by my company, Unicorn Labs, and co-created with Stephen Silver (Kim Possible, Danny Phantom) and Frank Rocco (Wow Wow Wubbzy, Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness).

It's a wonderfully enjoyable story with beautiful, hand-drawn art, intensely great audio, and a treasure chest full of 70+ fun surprises.

Plus, it showcases the power of our ebook creation engine, Unicorn Engine for eBooks, which enables rapid development of highly interactive ebooks in a fraction of the time and cost of completely custom efforts.

In fact, via the Unicorn Engine, we have already earned both a coveted Kirkus Star on David A. Carter's 'Spot the Dot,' which we produced for Ruckus Media, and achieved a Top 10 revenue grossing eBook on 'Rabbit and Turtle's Amazing Race.' 

What is 'Jolly' about? It is a story about dueling pirates, a witch's curse, and a little boy who dreams of becoming a pirate. It is the first chapter in a continuing saga, a true original creation for a rapidly evolving medium.

The book is priced at $4.99, and there is a free Lite version that you can check out to "try before you buy," but to celebrate the launch, we are pricing 'Jolly' at 99 cents for one-week only.

To get a flavor of what Jolly and Roger's Misguided Adventures: Quest for the Dragon Tear is all about, check out this one minute video trailer.

Update: AppAdvice has a decent write-up of the book, and is giving away a few promo codes for a free download of the book. Check it out.

Update #2: ANSCA (makers of Corona) has honored the book by naming it their App of the Week. Also, here is the Podcast that I did in tandem with it being announced.

Update #3: Our book is picking up steam, and 'Jolly' is now the #44 Top Paid iPad Book App.

Related:

  1. The Five Keys to a Successful eBook Production: The Story of Spot the Dot
  2. Kirkus Reviews gives Spot the Dot a Kirkus Star as a Book of Remarkable Merit
  3. Rebooting the Book: One iPad at a Time
  4. Anatomy of an eBook App

November 23, 2011 in Apple, Books, Digital Media, iOS, Media, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

The Netflix 'narrative' problem, and how to fix it

Netflix-AppleTV-HiRes
A brand is a distillation of the 'narratives' that a company pledges to satisfy for its constituency base of customers, partners, employees and investors.

These narratives speak to the company's value proposition, including the core jobs it is hired for and outcomes that it delivers, and equally, represents a commitment to deliver same consistently. 

When well-managed, the brand creates a trusted bond that can materially increase customer loyalty and operating margins, while reducing the cost to acquire new customers. In the process, such brand equity is tantamount to free advertising, and also inures a nice 'halo' effect on the company's stock.

But, when a brand appears to disregard the promises behind its narratives, irreparable damage can come to the business.

In the packaged goods realm, Perrier is a textbook example of a company doing everything wrong in living up to the standards of its brand (when reports leaked out about the cancer-causing chemical Benzene polluting its sparkling water product), and never rebounding from this disconnect.

Tylenol, by contrast, is a textbook case of a brand coming back stronger than ever by living to its credo in the face of dark circumstances (when pills tainted with Cyanide lead to several deaths of Tylenol users).

Enter Netflix, who faces a comparably life-threatening disaster (to their brand, not consumers' lives) to that faced by Perrier and Tylenol some time back, prompting the obvious question. Is the Netflix story destined to play out like Perrier or Tylenol?

But first, two disclaimers. One, I am a very happy current Netflix streaming customer and a former Netflix DVD customer, having quit the latter when the pricing model changed (I did not see enough value to continue, given my family's usage patterns).

My happiness with streaming stems from the fact that Netflix's streaming catalog is sufficiently wide and deep (although obviously not to the level of the DVD offering), and the service is sufficiently rich and enjoyable that my entire family accesses its programming on a near-daily basis.

As such, Netflix streaming has earned a spot in my living room, and in fact, is the primary usage anchor to my Apple TV.

I state this upfront, as I know many who don't see the streaming programming in a similar wide/deep/good enough light. Your mileage may vary.

The second disclaimer is that when I first trialed the Netflix hybrid service a few months back (yes, I ignored Netflix marketing for YEARS), I contacted DIRECTV, my satellite service, to tell them that I was canceling my Starz pack.

“Why?” Asked the DIRECTV support person. When I told them that I was allocating those dollars to Netflix, I promptly got a significant discount not to cancel Starz, which tells you all that you need to know about how DIRECTV views Netflix competitively.

These two data points provide some context for understanding Reed Hasting’s most recent shareholder letter, where he adroitly positions Netflix streaming as in the 'HBO bucket' (@ $8/month vs. HBO @ $12/month), as Peter Kafka notes in this extended excerpt Hasting's letter in Kafka's excellent ‘Comeback Plan’ piece. Says Hasting:

In television… the networks (ABC, FX, etc.) have long relied upon exclusive content to differentiate among themselves. As video moves online, so too has this practice of exclusive content. HBO has an exclusive license to recent Universal movies that includes its online HBO GO, for example. Netflix has signed exclusive licenses for DreamWorks Animation, for Relativity, and others. In episodic television, exclusives are also the norm. Netflix doesn’t license “Deadwood” from HBO because they see strategic value in keeping it exclusive. Netflix licenses “Mad Men” and “House of Cards” exclusively for much the same reason.

…We don’t have to “beat” Starz or other networks to succeed…We won’t have every movie or TV series; but we do provide enough value that consumers also want to subscribe to Netflix.

Any given consumer will have only one of DirecTV or Comcast, say, for their video service. That is classic either‐or competition. But with premium television networks like Netflix, the more good experiences there are, the more consumers are willing to spend to have multiple channels from which to get enjoyment.

Netflix Faces an Interesting Quandary

But, pursuing such an opportunity is not without peril.

On the one hand, Netflix is well-positioned to go after the HBO ‘premium channel’ bucket. Their long-tail catalog is relatively cheap and deep (in contrast to movie blockbuster programming), and they seem to have a good process in place for locking down that content.

In the big picture, it makes Netflix streaming better value and more enjoyable than HBO, save for HBO's hit series and new movie releases (which is 70-80% of my viewing time on HBO). 

At the same time, it seems very plausible that Netflix can "sprinkle in" enough 'must see' programming to secure a major foothold in this market.

If they can, then being on-demand, having wide distribution and delivering the composite viewing experience that Netflix offers (in tandem with the aforementioned) is a compelling value proposition for their rapidly growing 20M+ base of subscribers.

The quandary, however, is that streaming is diametrically opposed to DVD (and vice-versa), not only in terms of business model, but customer base as well.

It's the proverbial fork in the road, which is why they wanted to get rid of DVD in the first place. However, in being so ready to kick their loyal DVD customer base to second-tier status, they essentially dumped their long-term spouse to run off with the 'hot blonde,' which is tantamount to betrayal.

Is it any wonder that their brand image, stock and subscriber base has taken such a serious hit?

Now, I have a theory as to why they would act so dispassionately (economics aside), but more on that in a moment.

Either way, streaming is now the dog, and DVD is now the tail, and there is no use in pretending that it is otherwise. You can't fully put humpty-dumpty back together again.

For the DVD user, this is a perfect opportunity to see if the grass is greener elsewhere, and if it's not, take some solace that Netflix had their come to Jesus moment, and is re-committing to you. Forgive, but don't forget.

For the non-DVD Netflix user, other than the WTF aspect of how poorly orchestrated this was and the corresponding questions it raises about Netflix's once-pristine stewardship, it's mostly a non-event.

For investors, however, it's a value reset (as Felix Salmon notes at Reuters), for which there are no easy answers, save for time. The stock is down 75% since mid-year, and could go up, down, or sideways. It's anyone's guess. What is HBO worth, anyway?

In a perfect world, Netflix would operate the DVD service going forward (so as to maintain their brand equity), but someone else would own the business, maybe private equity.

What about Warren Buffett? He likes great brands. What about the DVD device makers, who need to extend the useful life of DVDs? 

Pursuing such a move would be Amazon-like in terms of knowing your core business, but being platform-minded and thinking outside the box in terms of growing and mainting the mindshare of your constituency.

Until they reconcile this intellectually, I suspect their body language is going to be akin to the unhappy couple that stays married for the benefit of the kids. Everyone's unhappy, including the kids.

A Brand Collision with Corporate Culture

10a_Images_DevicesI read a particularly harsh take on Netflix’s corporate culture called ‘Netflix: Terror at the Top?’

It argues that Netflix has a fear-based management culture where people are pretty readily discarded if they don’t live up to expectations.

There's good and bad in this. Great companies demand peak performance from their personnel, regardless of whether it’s someone operating at customer-facing, production, business development, marketing or management levels.

'A' players hire 'A' players. 'B's' hire 'C's,' and so on. While there's nothing warm and fuzzy about this, the fact remains that it often leads to better products and solutions.

But, one gets the sense that Netflix is dogmatic about this to the point that people are pushed out if/when they disappoint, and sooner or later, everyone disappoints, which creates a bit of schizophrenia, even if it has (clearly) served Netflix well -- prior to the current cluster-f-ck. 

In this context, one can see how pragmatic, intellectually-focused Reed Hastings sees one business materially contracting, and another showing substantial growth. He sees fundamentally different customer bases (color me dubious on this assertion of his) and different economics + licensing rights.

Were he a cynic, he could simply milk the business AOL-style, and keep his mouth shut. But, then how to position a service where the DVD narrative confuses the messaging, positioning and business approach of Streaming, especially when heretofore, the conventional wisdom was that Streaming was something free bundled on DVD?

Thus, the Qwikster moniker could be looked at one of two ways. As a company intentionally tarring their old business, so as to better segment their new business. 

Or, as a realization that as 'NOT Netflix,' the footprint of jobs that the service could target might change. They have already talked about games, but why not incorporate game consoles and Blue-Ray players, for example?

Either way, they now have a profitable, variable cost business with no uptick in subscriber acquisition cost to maintain.

It’s like saying, “DVD you can come if you want, but streaming is who we're courting.” Hastings basically compares DVD to the aforementioned AOL dialup business in ther earnings call.

Envisioning a Native Controller Client

Netflix-Controller

Here's where's the company can start turning the page. Namely, by showing how, as a native IP streaming service, Netflix has the potential to create new extensions to its core offering that make it more:

  • Social
  • Manage-able
  • Synchronized

The above Netflix Controller client that I've mocked up shows how such an experience might come together.

On the social front, the client makes it easy to broadcast what you are watching now to friends, including one-click access to that current scene/sequence that you are watching now for synchronized viewing, something that can't be readily done with DVDs.

A structured chat interface makes it easy to communicate in a way that is synchronous, shared and contextually linked to the specific content being watched, which opens to door to all sorts of news ways to both discover content and connect with like minds in real-time.

The ability to tie favorite scenes, movie trailers and favorite reviews together into a sort of IMDB on steroids type of listing is the third leg that makes this type of experience fresh and alive.

It hearkens back to a classic old Logitech ad introducing the wireless mouse where they contrast wired vs. wireless by showing a baby wearing a diaper (as the wired proxy), with the label 'Good' above the picture.

Adjacent to it, is the label 'Better,' with a diaper-less, giddy baby peeing a stream in the air. The message being that wireless is liberating.

Netting it out: Netflix needs to play a bit of three-dimensional chess so that its legacy DVD customers, who made the brand what it is, don't irreversibly pollute it, as many are emotionally prepared to do.

In parallel, it needs to spend some with its investor base articulating why Netflix's updated vision is a greater outcome than simply milking legacy (including better articulation of the likely 'honest outcome' for DVD).

And it needs to get back on offense by showcasing what a native IP streaming service can do that neither a legacy DVD biz nor a premium cable/satellite channel can touch.

Related:

  1. The Magic Adapter: Apple TV and the battle for the living room
  2. Apple, TV and the Smart, Connected Living Room
  3. Is Facebook a Brand that You Can Trust?

 

October 26, 2011 in Amazon, Apple, Branding, Coaching, Digital Media, Entertainment, Media, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

(CHART) Head-to-Head for Ten Years: Wal-Mart, Amazon, Google and Apple

Ten-Years

This chart is illuminating, I think. Wal-Mart is so completely instutionalized that the present, past and future seem "priced in." It's obviously a great company, but how can you argue any differently?

Meanwhile, Google is making a ton of money, is completely dominant in search advertising, and has executed their moat strategy very effectively.

Yet, when positioned side-by-side against Amazon and Apple, it too, is far removed from tremendous "upside surprises."

Netting it out: Apple and Amazon still seem to know how to pull rabbits out of their hats, and their stocks reflect it.

It's something to think about in handicapping the next stage of the media tablet market, and the respective ecosystems that will emerge, sustain or get marginalized around same.

UPDATE:Steven Cains (@cains) notes via twitter that it's not really fair to compare $WMT due to dividends (Wal-Mart pays em; Apple, Amazon and Google don't). It's an obviously fair point, but if anything, it seems to affirm the macro narrative that Wal-Mart's got predictability (in all forms) priced in.

September 20, 2011 in Amazon, Android, Apple, Google, Media, Metrics, Mobile, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Jolly & Roger's Misguided Adventures: An iPad eBook Adventure Like No Other

J-R-Title_Screen_01_Rev

Produced by Unicorn Labs (Spot the Dot, Rabbit and Turtle's Amazing Race, Unicorn Disco), and created by Stephen Silver (Kim Possible, Danny Phantom) and Frank Rocco (Fairly Odd Parents, Wow Wow Wubbzy), Jolly & Roger's Misguided Adventures is an interactive ebook that is built from the ground up for the iPad.

It features beautiful, hand-drawn art, classic keyframe animations, and a treasure chest full of surprises, including quirky touch interactions, and wondrous, ambient sounds.

Jolly & Roger's is the first chapter in a continuing saga - a story of dueling pirates, a curse, and the quest for redemption. It is also a story about youth and innocence, of a little boy, and his dream to become a pirate.

The book is in late production, and due to ship later this month.

What follows is a short video trailer on the book, and below that, a sneak peek into the world of Jolly & Roger.

eBook Video Trailer

"Sneak Peek" Video

Related Posts:

  1. Rebooting the Book: One iPad at a Time (O'Reilly Radar)
  2. The Five Keys to a Successful eBook Production: The Story of Spot the Dot
  3. Kirkus Reviews gives Spot the Dot a Kirkus Star as a Book of Remarkable Merit

August 04, 2011 in Books, Digital Media, Entertainment, iOS, Media | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Comic-Con, Convergence and the Rise of Integrated Media

Comic-Con

"Here’s my prediction: Almost every dotcom idea from 10 years ago that failed will succeed." - Marc Andreessen

When I got into tech back in 1994, convergence was was the holy grail.

It was borne of the idea that one day the then-immovable boundaries between the following industries would collapse, enabling a new kind of integrated value chain to emerge:

  • Television
  • Motion Pictures
  • Music
  • Consumer Electronics
  • Internet
  • Telephony
  • Print Media
  • Advertising
  • Videogames
  • Computing

The promise of this concept led Sony, the inventor of the Walkman, to acquire Columbia Pictures. It led regional phone service provider, Bell Atlantic, seeking to re-factor the communications and entertainment landscape, to pursue a merger with cable TV giant, TCI.

In fact, over the next decade, the 'promised land' of convergence drove a flurry of mergers and acquisitions, reaching its apex when Time Warner merged with AOL.

AOL-TW

That many of these deals failed disastrously (in the case of AOL Time Warner) or were never consummated (in the case of Bell Atlantic-TCI) is besides the point.

Poor execution aside, the pursuers of convergence were simply ahead of their time, a truth bounded by the way that:

  1. Apple has reshaped so many of these industries by vertically integrating them across media, mobile and tablet device form-factors from distribution channel to software platform, apps and media marketplace.
  2. Comcast has leveraged physical connectivity to so many homes (and a commensurate billing relationship) into owning NBCUniversal, extensive cable channel holdings and a growing telephony business.
  3. Amazon has emerged as Walmart, Cloud Computing platform and Kindle/tablet maker, rolled into one.

Put another way, as a VC friend of mine once said, "It's as lethal to be too early, as it is to be wrong."

It's this truth that gives folks like Marc Andreesseen the confidence to predict that many of the lamest ideas of the dotcom period will yet be vindicated (I think that he's right on this one), and it's this same truth that was on display at Comic-Con 2011 aka San Diego Comic-Con International.

A Snapshot of how 'Integrated' Media has Become

Comic-Con-Souvenir For me, the AHA moment in planning my Comic-Con experience was attempting to digest a priori an event guide that was almost 200 pages, and it was full of...actual events!

Consider, a four-day long event that literally envelops the city and county of San Diego, bringing in over 130,000 fans of comic books, horror, animation, manga, games and fantasy, making it the single largest convention in America.

If you want to see how integrated media has become (and can become), ponder an event that provides a unified sandbox for:

  1. Content Producers to showcase, screen and publicize their new Comic Books, Movie Releases, Cable TV shows, Videogames and Toys;
  2. Fans to meet cast members, industry luminaries and their favorite artists, and get their autographs; see their latest projects and hear them talk about them; and, oh yeah, dress up as their favorite characters;
  3. Vendors to sell Books, T-Shirts, Posters, Toys, Artwork, Comics and other industry paraphanelia;
  4. Artists to present their portoflios for review and potential hire by content producers.

CafeDiem Btw, if you're familiar with the integrated media unit known as a "home page takeover" on a web site, consider what Syfy channel did in taking over an actual, physical restaurant (Maryjane's Coffee Shop in Hard Rock Hotel), and rebranding it for the event as Syfy's CafeDiem, down to the signage, tabletops and menus.

One can only wonder if the boring, staid Oscars and Emmy Awards events were reinvisioned as a like-type festival for producers, fans, vendors and artists alike if, maybe, just maybe, the industry would foment a deeper bond between their audience and their slate of programs/movie releases, not to mention the publicity and promotion food chain.

The Moral of the Story

Apple logo blue When I think of the enormous success of Comic-Con (especially relative to the general lameness of the trade show industry in general), and I ponder the recent blowout earnings of both Amazon and Apple, I think about how often conventional wisdom gets things wrong specifically by creating false 'Either/OR' dichotomies.

In the tech business, for the longest time it was not only conventional wisdom, but it was the gospel and hardline religion, that you had to be horizontally organized, and focused on one thing, one discrete line of business, or you were destined to the scrap heap of history.

The truth of the matter is that a lot has to go right, both tactically and culturally, for convergence and integration to work.

But seeing how much of a win (for all types of users) such integrated platforms are across Post-PC (Apple), Commerce (Amazon) and Media (Comic-Con), I think that it's just a matter of time before the next wave - Convergence 2.0 - is born.

After all, where visionary leaders show the way, smart students will follow.

Related Posts:

  1. Ruminations on MacWorld 2011 and the Future of Trade Shows
  2. The Programmable Fan Site: A New Media/Ad Unit Model
  3. Apple's Segmentation Strategy (and the Folly of Conventional Wisdom)
  4. Thoughts on Book Expo America trade show: Rebooting the Book - Part Two

 

July 28, 2011 in Advertising, Amazon, Apple, Books, Digital Media, Entertainment, Games, Marketing, Media, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC, Television | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

FIRST-TIME VISITOR?

FOLLOW MY TWEETS

READ MY COLUMN

PLAY AND LEARN WITH WALLACE

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    WHAT I'M READING

    • Grantland
    • Fred Wilson (A VC)
    • kottke.org
    • AppleInsider
    • Daring Fireball
    • Felix Salmon
    • Forum Blue and Gold (Lakers)
    • GigaOM

    Recent Posts

    • American Exceptionalism: Dancing on the Razor's Edge
    • It’s a Madhouse: Thoughts on Gun Reform and Being Serious about Real Problems
    • Life Lessons: Always Be Teaching
    • Find Your Purpose
    • Ruminations on The Fountainhead vs. Atlas Shrugged: When Does Personal Integrity Become Narcissism and Sociopathy?
    • Ruminations on the Test Drive: If you want to see how it ENDS, look at how it BEGINS
    • Ruminations on Curiosity
    • Understanding the "Vampires" Among Us
    • On Bias, False Dichotomies (and other Four Letter Words)
    • Two of the biggest truths about understanding the power of Incentives

    Archives

    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021

    More...

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Subscribe in a reader
    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 07/2005