The Network Garden - Mark Sigal's Blog

Digital media, being an entrepreneur, intelligent investing and other interesting nuggets

About

My Photo
View Mark Sigal's profile on LinkedIn
See how we're connected

WHAT HAVE I BUILT?

ASK ABOUT THE 9 TRUTHS

JOLLY & ROGER'S EBOOK VIDEO TRAILER

Chatopic Book Series

  • Chris Anderson: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution

    Chris Anderson: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution

  • Clayton M. Christensen: How Will You Measure Your Life?

    Clayton M. Christensen: How Will You Measure Your Life?

  • Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow

    Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow

  • Phil Lapsley: Exploding the Phone: The Untold Story of the Teenagers and Outlaws who Hacked Ma Bell

    Phil Lapsley: Exploding the Phone: The Untold Story of the Teenagers and Outlaws who Hacked Ma Bell

  • Rachel Maddow: Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power

    Rachel Maddow: Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power

  • Daniel H. Pink: A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future

    Daniel H. Pink: A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future

  • Susan Cain: Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking

    Susan Cain: Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking

  • Patricia S. Churchland: Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality

    Patricia S. Churchland: Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality

  • Daniel Imhoff: Food Fight: The Citizen's Guide to the Next Food and Farm Bill

    Daniel Imhoff: Food Fight: The Citizen's Guide to the Next Food and Farm Bill

Categories

  • Advertising (4)
  • Amazon (28)
  • Android (29)
  • Apple (72)
  • Basketball (2)
  • Books (21)
  • Branding (4)
  • Coaching (155)
  • Current Affairs (61)
  • Design (11)
  • Digital Media (261)
  • Economy (14)
  • Education (4)
  • Entertainment (6)
  • Facebook (3)
  • Film (6)
  • Games (3)
  • Google (26)
  • Humor (9)
  • Ideation (164)
  • Information Management (56)
  • Investing (197)
  • iOS (47)
  • Local (1)
  • Marketing (5)
  • Media (10)
  • Metrics (16)
  • Mobile (39)
  • Music (2)
  • Pattern Recognition (98)
  • People Connections (8)
  • Policy (6)
  • Politics (4)
  • Post-PC (65)
  • Religion (1)
  • Retailing (7)
  • San Francisco (1)
  • Spirit (23)
  • Sports (22)
  • Streams and Nuggets (424)
  • Television (9)
  • Travel (2)
  • Values (3)
  • Weblogs (1)
See More

Grab my RSS feed

Where do good ideas come from?

Light-Bulb

There is a buddhist axiom, 'First Thought, Best Thought' that speaks to the power of spontaneity and intuition.

When presented with conflicting internal (or inter-personal) narratives, I will always default to first thought, best thought thinking.

But default, is not destiny. Sometimes the first thought isn't the best thought.

It may be ill-advised. It may be muddy and unclear. It may confuse tail with dog. Or any number of in-between possibilities.

I thought about this today in talking with a friend, an accomplished artist and author who has sold millions of titles from original work that he has created.

The impetus was a project that looked at the onset like a really good idea...after first thought...second thought...and even third thought. 

But upon careful reflection, challenged by a key litmus test question, my friend acknowledged that that one unspoken element had stuck in his craw.

He was apologetic, now finding himself at a cross-roads when heretofore, he had only seen an open road ahead.

I, on the other hand, was non-plussed. 

I write a ton, have started a bunch of companies, and launched many projects, big and small, so I know how the creative process goes.

Sometimes these things drop from the heavens, a gift from the gods.

Other times, it's grope, ship the idea, tweak, iterate, finesse, re-think, re-work and then polish.

Still others, it's bury in an unmarked grave.

We can't always know when ideas are good. But unless we are willing to take that first step, we're simply standing still.

Related:

  1. The tyranny of the 'All or None'
  2. Start in the Middle

 

February 26, 2013 in Coaching, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

The 3 S's of a Good Partner: Smart, Strategically Aligned, Skin in the Game

Smart-Strategic-Skin

Effective partnering strategy is one of the areas that many businesses struggle with, especially startups.

Specifically, companies gravitate between two extremes. One is the wasted cycles of 'press release' partners, where the deliverable is a press release full of platitudes, but nothing tied towards product or push (i.e., growing sales or distribution).

Two is the realm where material resources are committed in the form of product development or marketing spend where the outcome goals are simply nebulous.

For startups, the dilemma of when and how to partner is doubly confusing, as entrepreneurs fight daily the often conflicting challenges of: A) Maintaining the optics of forward progress; and B) Managing the harsh truth that nothing is truly free.

Simply put, every commitment is an offset of an already precious recource, be it time, reputation or dollars.

So how to decide when a prospective partner is worth the investment of real engagement and/or dollars?

My experience has been that when the following three assertions are true, a bonafide partnership has the elements to take root.
  1. They're Smart: In the universe of customers, partners and investors, there are smart partners, who make you better by asking the right questions, pushing the right outcomes, and opening your eyes to the big picture; and those that don't. To be clear, this isn't about IQ; it's about Contextual Intelligence.
  2. They're Strategically Aligned: Strategy is all about where you want to get to at the end of the day. Is the partner striving to get to a place that you specifically want to go? Are they taking complementary vehicles to get there? 
  3. They have Skin in the Game: There is a great axiom about chickens and pigs. In terms of putting food on the table, both the chicken and the pig can get the job done. But there is a fundamental difference in their level of commitment. The chicken (hen) is merely engaged when it lays an egg. But the pig is truly committed, as it has real skin in the game in serving up its bacon. Moral of the story? Look for partners with real skin in the game. They are less likely to go AWOL or randomly change directions on you at the most inopportune times.

Related:

  1. Would you rather work with a chicken or a pig?
  2. What Makes Us Happy?
  3. Start in the Middle

February 15, 2013 in Coaching, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Picture Puzzles is the next app in the 'Play and Learn with Wallace' Series

Picture Puzzles is the latest app in the 'Play and Learn with Wallace' early learning series of apps. It joins existing apps, Counting Fun, My First App and First Spelling.

It features six different puzzle games that help develop a child's creative skills, test their visual sense and build spatial awareness. 

The games in Picture Puzzles are:

  • Follow the Lines: Ten different mini-games where a child must navigate a series of dots to complete the game
  • Noisy Zoo: Match the picture to the animal sound (eight different variations)
  • Puzzle Pieces: Touch the puzzle piece that completes the puzzle (four different puzzles)
  • Shadow Shapes: Find the shadowed object that matches the picture (15 different variations)
  • Spot the Dot: Identify the falling dot that matches the requested color (eight different variations)
  • Matching Twins: Find the matching twins hidden behind the cards (20 different variations)

Like all games in Play and Learn with Wallace, Picture Puzzles integrates with our Personalized Profile and Rewards Chart system, so kids can feel great about their progress.

Also, the content in the apps loads in randomly so kids don't get bored.

When you purchase two or more apps, the apps can be Super Shuffled together, giving kids the benefit of a blended learning experience. Learning professionals will tell you that blended learning is one of the best ways for kids to learn rapidly and retain more deeply.

As always, the full-featured trial is FREE.

To find our more about the system, watch the above video, read my original post on the topic, or better yet, download the software on your iPad.

To celebrate the launch, Picture Puzzles is 99 cents for a limited time only (it's usually $3.99).

Picture Puzzles Screen Shots

Follow-the-Lines
Noisy-Zoo
Puzzle-Fun
Shadow-Shapes
Spot-the-Dot Matching-Twins

February 11, 2013 in Education, Games, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

PCs, Media Devices and Mobile Devices: Before and After Apple

Before-Apple-After-Apple

If there is a truism about Apple's approach to innovation, it is this.

They find segments for which the existing solution is complex and kludgy, and make it simple and unified.

In doing so, they bring it to the mainstream.

There is nothing elitist in this approach. Quite the opposite.

Most would concur that after Apple, access to computers, music, and mobile computing was more broadly accessible, not less. 

For every door they close in the open vs. closed debate, they open ten others. Most would concur that both the mobile web is better for the platform that Apple created, and the native app ecosystem is richer for it.

Haters are gonna hate, and it's in our nature to tire of winners winning all of the time.

But let's not confuse the essential truth of what Apple has built and continues to build.

We need more companies like Apple, not less, and we should celebrate their success, not pillory it.

Related:

  1. Cry Babies: The Strange, Confusing Path of the Apple Investor
  2. OMG, WTF is going on with Apple Stock
  3. What is Apple Worth: The 'Gold Standard' Thesis

February 05, 2013 in Apple, Metrics, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

It's All About Them: Understanding Selfish Narratives

Its-All-About-Them

I was talking with a friend the other day about their career aspirations. To their credit, they were REALLY clear about their bulls-eye, what they are looking for and why, which is great. I am an advocate of casting one's net narrowly and specifically, something I call a "narrow net" strategy.

But one thing that I noticed as my friend was talking was how little of their peronal narrative was focused on the selfish goals of the company that would hire them.

This underscores a fairly common truth that many struggle with. We love to hear ourselves talk - especially about ourselves. This explains why most of us are great self advocates.

But, here's the rub. Other people are focused on THEIR aspirations and their narratives.

Hence, understanding this essential truth is often the difference between getting the:

  • Sale
  • Job
  • Girl (or Guy)

And not.

My advice then is this. Work backwards from the "selfish narrative" of your audience, be it prospective employer, customer, new hire, publicity target or love interest.

Ask yourself: what are the selfish narratives that speak to them most clearly, compellingly and why?

What kind of story can you tell that credibly expresses that that's you?

After all, empathy and understanding are not just about being good. They are also about getting the outcomes that you want.

Related:

  1. Career Path: The Narrow Net Strategy
  2. Instagram, Kodak and the Selfish GeneUnder

January 29, 2013 in Coaching, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Cry Babies: The Strange, Confusing Path of the Apple Investor

Cry-Baby-Apple

"GODDAMNIT, APPLE IS DOOMED!! Wait… that’s profit? Carry on." - Jim Dalrymple

Let me preface my comments by saying that I am LONG Apple, so I am not real happy at the moment.

Consider, a company that:

  • Routinely beats its own projections, generating more revenue ($54B) in a quarter than Google generates in a year. (Side note: fuck the analysts' projections - if they knew shit, they would have anticipated the collapse of DotCom, the 2008 financial crisis, etc.)
  • Is consistently, mind-numbingly profitable, yielding outsized profits that have fattened their cash hoard to $137 billion dollars. You'd have to look to the gas & oil industry to find another company that is comparably profitable.
  • Has not one multi-billion dollar line of business, but six of them (iPhone, iPad, Mac, iPod, iTunes, Accessories), and all of these lines of businesses feed off of a common ecosystem, creating leverage, lock-in, loyalty and all sorts of halo effects. In fact, the company sold over 75 million iOS devices in this most recent quarter.
  • Is unequaled in terms of having an R&D engine for creating new products that generate massive new revenue sources -- not just defensive moats.
  • Has cracked the code to selling in China ($7B in most recent quarter; 60% year-over-year growth), something few other American companies have done.
  • Despite a reputation for secrecy (with new product launches - duh), sets the bar for transparency with investors, breaking out minutiae on product lines, growth rates, ASPs, sales channels, same store numbers, etc. Contrast this with comparable growth companies, like Amazon, Google and Netflix, where the details are much more surface level.

Apple Revenue by Product and Operating Segments

Apple-Breakout

Thus, it is with little surprise that Apple is:

  • Getting tarred and feathered after hours, down $52, or 10%. As someone put so eloquently on twitter, "I never thought I would see "$54 Billion" and "light on revenues" in the same headline. 
  • Trading at a P/E of 10.4, and excluding cash, a P/E of 7.1. By contrast, Amazon is up over 20% following a report of a LOSS in their most recent quarter, and investors loved Google's most recent revenue miss (the stock shot up 5%). Oh by the way, neither Google nor Amazon pay dividends, something to keep in mind when you hear an investor lamenting that Apple should increase their dividend.

Stock Performance: Apple vs. Amazon vs. Google

Apple-Goog-AMZN 

Let me net it out for you

To say that investors are idiots, really is an unfair dig at idiots.

The more nuanced truth is that we tire of winners and root for their demise. We trust so-called experts, even when all of the data suggests that not only are they clueless but hopelessly conflicted as well. 

And most disappointingly, we don't reward transparency and being treated like adults when it comes to investing.

We respond best when we are teased, ignored or treated like children. 

For Apple, the hard truth on this one is to:

A) Be comfortable with the bottom line that rumors and outright lies nothwithstanding (I am talking about you, iPhone 5 rumor-mongers), there is only Apple when it comes to products, customers and profits. Everyone else is in the "not exactly" bucket;

B) Give up the game of sandbagging and then beating earnings, and focus investors on a real earnings range (as they did in this call) so clueless analysts and the media that lap up their dog vomit, can't harm them;

C) Embrace the Jeff Bezos ethos about being willing to be misunderstood for long periods of time, and wear that as a badge of honor with investors.

If you are Tim Cook, and company, you sleep well knowing that your North Star is as bright as ever.

But, at the same time, knowing how many investors are hysterically blind to the potent lights emitted by that star, must sting a little, no?

UPDATE:

  1. Jim Dalrymple, who I quoted in the entry to this piece, writes today, "How the hell does this happen? Amazon misses its earnings, income fell, sales missed Wall Street consensus and… the stock price goes up 6 percent.Apple sells a gazillion of everything, reports record revenue and profit, and its stock falls."

Related:

  1. OMG, WTF is going on with Apple Stock
  2. What is Apple Worth: The 'Gold Standard' Thesis
  3. Get ready for the Apple + iPhone backlash
  4. Apple's North Star: Four Takeaways from Apple's Q4 Earnings Call

 

January 23, 2013 in Apple, Investing, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Introducing Play and Learn with Wallace



This short video is a superb encapsulation of what I have been working on for the past year with the good folks at Macmillan Children's Publishing, and their much beloved imprint, Priddy Books.

If you don't know them by name, Priddy is the maker of over 500 books, including First Words, ranked by Scholastic as one of the 100 Greatest Books for Kids. They have sold over 100M titles over the past decade so they really understand the early learning segment.

Working around a model known as co-creation, we called upon our own learnings from building dozens of ebooks, apps and games at Unicorn Labs, combined those learnings with the ethos and IP of Priddy, and a built that into a series of early learning apps.

These apps are delightfully fun for kids, to be sure, but in the process of play, kids develop cognitive, creative, spelling, math and drawing skills.

What's unique about the approach is that while each app can be used separately, the apps can also be "super-shuffled," or mixed together dynamically, to provide what is known as blended learning, a proven methodology that helps children learn more rapidly and more deeply.

I will write more about the system that underlies 'Play and Learn,' but in the interim, I would encourage you to watch the video, and download the app, which is free.

New titles in the series will be rolling out monthly. In fact, here's a teaser about our next title, Picture Puzzles, which launches at the end of the month.

Picture-Puzzles-is-coming

Related:

  1. Rebooting the Book (One iPad at a Time)
  2. Kirkus Reviews gives Spot the Dot a Kirkus Star as a Book of Remarkable Merit

January 15, 2013 in Design, Digital Media, Education, Games, iOS, Mobile, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Why the mobile web vs. mobile apps debate is a false dichotomy (GigaOM)

Mobile-Native-v-Mobile-Web

The mobile web versus mobile native “grudge match” rages on, with over 300 comments to Super VC Fred Wilson’s post on whether now is the time to invest in mobile web apps (and services) over mobile native ones.

But the arguments presented in favor of the mobile web over mobile native represent a false dichotomy. Simply put, there is no universal truth in the mobile web vs. mobile native debate, and no “one right way,” despite what the pontificators would have you believe.

The argument in favor of mobile web goes like this: The web is open, ubiquitous, requires no special software, is globally searchable and algorithmically discoverable. As such, it is agile, extensible and readily manageable. Plus, there are lots of proven models for development, discovery, distribution and monetization. And, of course, mobile web development offers a higher degree of symmetry to PC browser-based web development than mobile native app development does.

The argument is favor of mobile native goes like this: There are over 400 million iOS devices and over 500 million Android devices, representing almost 1 billion devices worldwide. In the case of iOS, Apple has built a well-managed development, distribution and monetization platform that has yielded tremendous innovation and user engagement in areas ranging from photography to gaming, social networking, entertainment, education, music and other rich media.

On some level, the argument comes down to “good enough” and “universal” vs. the “richest possible experience” on the device type that is subsuming the PC.

Read the full article at GigaOM.

Related:

  1. The iPhone, the Angry Bird and the Pink Elephant (O'Reilly)
  2. The short 'half-life' of apps and the App Store 
  3. OMG, WTF is going on with Apple Stock?

December 20, 2012 in Amazon, Android, Apple, iOS, Mobile, Pattern Recognition, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

(INTERVIEW) PBS MediaShift - Tools for creating + publishing ebooks

Spot-the-DotYou can read the full piece HERE, but this is the salient excerpt:

But these new tech tools are not just for self-publishers anymore. While you don't see Big Publishing innovating much around the new capabilities, smaller publishers are eager to be first in the space.

Remember the popup book? They were mostly for kids, but I remember some great artsy books that used the delightful and complex popup "technology."

Unicorn Labs, a developer of e-books and early learning apps, worked with popup book maker David A. Carter to create "Spot the Dot," delivered in iTunes.

Chief Product Officer Mark Sigal describes it as "an interactive picture book app comprised of 10 different playspaces for young minds, such as 'Sliding Windows,' 'Popcorn' and 'Spinning Coins.'

We worked with the author to rethink the medium of the popup book for the iPad, a domain where touch, tilt, drag and rich voice and sound are native to the 'canvas.'" Kirkus Book Reviews recognized "Spot the Dot" as one of the Best Kids' Books Apps of 2011.

Related:

  1. Rebooting the Book - One iPad at a time (O'Reilly)
  2. Anatomy of an ebook app (O'Reilly)

December 20, 2012 in Books, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Post-PC Dividend: Average household spend on Apple products was $444

Oh, and that number has grown prodigiously since 2007:

In 2011, the average amount U.S. households spent on Apple products was $444, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty. That figure has been rising smartly every year. In 2010 it was $295. Back in 2007, it was only $150.

(via Daring Fireball)

December 11, 2012 in Apple, Metrics, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Tim Cook on the relationship between collaboration and integration to Apple's success

Tim-cook-apple-ceo

This Businessweek interview with Apple CEO Tim Cook is an excellent read, but I really nodded when Cook talked about Apple's unparalleled level of integration and the role that collaboration plays in their culture and organizational structure, inasmuch as it points a bow around the core thesis behind my recent GigaOM article on the age of indivisibility and integrated systems design. Here's Cook:

"You look at what we are great at. There are many things. But the one thing we do, which I think no one else does, is integrate hardware, software and services in such a way that most consumers begin to not differentiate anymore. They just care that the experience is fantastic. So how do we keep doing that and keep taking it to an even higher level? You have to be an A-plus at collaboration."

Sounds sooo simple, yet just a tiny handful of companies on the planet have found a way to do this across products segments, product lifecycles, and do so at scale -- over a multi-year period. That's the magic of Apple.

Read the full Cook interview HERE.

Read my GigaOM piece HERE.

December 06, 2012 in Apple, Coaching, Design, Investing, Marketing, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

OMG, WTF is going on with Apple Stock?

Apple-Crash-Burn

Apple stock is down 25% since late September, and the pundits, naysayers and Apple haters are all saying that if there is this much antipathy for Apple stock, maybe the smart money knows something.

The narrative reasoning behind this is straightforward, and it goes like this. One year after Steve Jobs' death, Apple's magic is gone. Siri sucks. Maps suck. iOS 6 is buggy. There is no more iPod, iPhone or iPad like 'breakthrough device' in the offing. Tim Cook isn't Steve Jobs-like in keeping his management team moving in lock-step. The Apple Retail hire was an obvious cultural miss-fit from day one.

Finally, the competitive offerings are getting 'good enough,' meaning: A) Margins are destined to be under pressure; and B) The flow of devices into customers hands, and cash into Apple's coffers, are poised for disruption.

First off, let me say that in early September I predicted this EXACT backlash to play out following the iPhone 5 announcement (see: 'Get ready for the Apple + iPhone backlash').

You can read the piece to gauge the many reasons why market indigestion was a given, but that doesn't address the larger question of whether Apple has really lost its mojo, or not.

I have three thoughts on this one:

  1. Stock Value: Apple is trading at a trailing price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of <12, and a forward PE of 9. By contrast, Google, which missed its latest earnings, is trading at a trailing PE of 20, and a forward PE of 14. Unless you believe that Apple is worth 60% of Google, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to conclude that something is amiss. In fact, the always-excellent Andy Zaky at Bullish Cross has done detailed analysis showing why at no point in recent history has Google been a better investment than Apple (see: 'Buy Google or Apple? The Answer is Simple'). Similarly, I wrote a piece some time back arguing that Apple is a "Gold Standard" investment, reserved for category leaders that consistently out-execute the competition; the point being that Apple's peers are not HP and Microsoft, but rather, Amazon, Google, Disney, Nike, McDonald's, Southwest Airlines, Berkshire Hathaway, Proctor & Gamble and Coca Cola. So what are those guys trading at? Factoring out Amazon, which trades at a wacky PE of 2,679, the averaged PE of those companies is 17.32. Again, Apple is trading at a PE that is 68% of the value of the Gold Standard companies (see: 'What is Apple Worth? The 'Gold Standard' Thesis'). The key point here is that whether you believe, as Andy Zaky argues, that Apple is a $1,000 stock in the next year or not, you should have conviction that Apple's stock values are out of whack.
  2. This Time is Different: Uh, no. Actually as Horace Dediu at Asymco shows, Apple has had multiple of these types of valuation contractions over the years, as the market is fairly simplistic, dumb and reactive when it comes to the Apple narrative. Also, know that Q4 is routinely their weakest quarter since it's the wedge between back to school and holiday, and typically the new iPhone launches late in the quarter, meaning that revenue does not pop until Q1, the holiday quarter. Analysts always miss this, and in fact, last year the stock dropped 13% based on the same narrative. Just as last year, the miss was analyst numbers, not Apple's, something that I noted then. In fact, following last year's Q4 disappointment + end of year tax selling through to their Q1 earnings call (end of February), the stock went up 44%. If it did something comparable, the stock would trade at $750.
  3. Apple and its Ecosystem: The other big picture is whether there are systemic issues fundamentally breaking Apple. Corporate culture is certainly a risk, and I am NOT betting that the company has another breakout iPad or iPhone type of device in 2013 (color me dubious on a game-changing Apple TV, which I blogged about HERE). Then again, they don't have to, as they are not priced richly, and there are a lot of legs left in iPhone and iPad in my opinion. Margins? Well, the margin story never ends, and yes, iPad mini tightens margins a bit, but then again, Apple's stock price assumes a margin collapse. What happens when margins tighten, but it's minimal? Is Apple losing business? Are they losing profits? Are they failing to generate cash? The answer is obvious - NO - so it really comes down to your intestinal fortitude and cash urgency as an investor. 

Obviously, I know no secrets, but if I were you, I would embrace the Warren Buffett-ism: Be greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy.

The market is acting fearful. Be greedy.

UPDATE: I thought that Tim Cook's comments on the relationship between integration and collaboration (in BusinessWeek interview), and how the translates to uniquely Apple execution was instructive. There are a small handful of companies on the plan that have the DNA to do this.

Related Posts:

  1. What is Apple Worth: The 'Gold Standard' Thesis
  2. Get ready for the Apple + iPhone backlash
  3. Why the Rumors About Apple Building a Television are Wrong (O'Reilly)

 

November 16, 2012 in Apple, Coaching, Google, Investing, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

Five thoughts on Mike D'Antoni coaching the Lakers

Lakers-logo

1. It's the Mike Brown do over.

2. It's moving forward as an organization. Phil felt like a two year warrior and not always on the road with the team. I think the Lakers are trying to win now AND build for the post Kobe future. That stated, watching Kobe play this season, is there any doubt that he totally buys into the system approach to making his teammates better? It's about rings at this point, not vanity. He's been very efficient.

3. Regarding D'Antoni style as Championship worthy, it's shades of '07 Suns.That was a tough team. I can see Nash, Blake or Morris running well in that type of offense. That could generate offense for the second unit  - e.g., Blake and Hill, Morris and Gasol.

4. With DH protecting the paint, they could disrupt a lot of teams with that uptempo style.

5. I can get behind this. Pick-and-roll basketball is a highly entertaining brand of basketball.

This has a 'Return to Showtime' feel about it.

November 12, 2012 in Sports, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

(GUEST POST) A New Engine of Growth: "Paint the Gutters"

Paint-the-Gutters

I have written a lot about the state of the US economy, especially as it pertains to the multiple industries undergoing painful disruption and related to this, the lack of catalysts for job creation in America (see HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE).

What follows is a guest post from a conversation post election night with Richard Knight of Korts and Knight, a kitchen and cabinetry design firm. Richard has a unique perspective, being a business man in a true "brick and mortar" segment that been been dually impacted by the rise of "showrooming" (see my piece 'Retail Needs a Reboot') and the weakened housing market.

Plus, having lived through many economic cycles over a 40 year career, his narrative and sensibility is both basic and profound:

"Quite a night last night. Glad that the campaign is finally over. Seeing the election map it is all too apparent that the country is really two countries, and that it is very hard to talk about it in one breath.

Those red states are all over the middle and the South. And then there is the blue West Coast. We are the multi ethinic, racial, diverse country that believes in the future, and is willing to embrace the holy trinity of Globalization, etc.

Then there are those undereducated white men and women, who are looking for some magic pill to restore the good old days. If we just cut back on everything, start saving, cut off the medical to poor people, and send the foreigners back home, everything will be OK.

Seems to me that it is hard to bring the entire country into the future and that whatever solutions we find will continue to add to the polarization of the country. 

One-Country

Regarding an engine for growth and for job creation, your example of Uber and Southwest (in my post on 'The Age of Indivisibility') are two fine examples.

And surely we will see more of this. But its kind of like my gardener. He provides a personal service for me, and his job is safe from globalization. It is the globalization that seems to me to me the immutable fact of the future.

Uber and Southwest avoid that issue by providing a local service. There are so many people in this world who are willing to work so much harder than us, for so little money, that it is hard to deny that they will provide the products that we need. Seems that either way manufacturing jobs are gone forever. Either they are made in this country with highly automated factories, or they are made abroad with millions of little fingers. 

The US is not the first to find that changing times see great cities degrade and crumble. Cairo is a typical example. It was once a very fine and Western (maybe European) city. But time has passed it by and it is a crumbling as its infrastructure has long sense been overwhelmed.

You will see the same all over the world. The ascendent cities of China represent the new and shiny and awe inspiring result of a rising culture. I think the USA is headed down the same road as Cairo. We have stopped dealing with maintenance.

Now, I see that very clearly in the suburbs. There was a time when personal pride kept everyone's home a source of pride. Green lawn out front, the painted porch, etc etc. If you take a ride into the suburbs, you will see quite a mess. I live in what I will call a typical middle class neighborhood, and you will see that people are not keeping up.

Lawns have died, fences are falling down, and there are more and more cars parked on the streets. And if you go into the heartland, something we did this summer when we motored across the country, Ohio is really third world. Once great neighborhoods, boarded up, overrun, abandoned. 

We have seen a slow degradation of life in America. In order to keep up our "standard of living" we have resorted to working longer, putting Mom to work, and living off our equity line to finance our lifestyle.

Now, it is becoming a case of, "Where can we cut further?" I think there is a lot of "hidden" belt tightening going on. We don't quantify maintenance, but houses are starting to fall down around people. We finally did some work around our house, I hired out some painting of gutters, some fences, and little stuff, and quickly spent 10k. It looks better, was overdue, but I could have just left it alone too. My guess is that people give up on insurance, don't go to the dentist, and cut back in lots of invisible ways. 

So much of what consumers want to spend their money on, represent things to "improve" their life experience. We define that as a new sweater, or a new gadget, (iPad mini). These are the things that are highly promoted, and we are convinced that we need. And these are the things that are made abroad, and where our money leaks out of the economy.

And so my grand idea is that what we need is more maintenance. If Americans would spend their money to paint the gutters, and learn to find satisfaction in that, (rather than a new gadget) then that money would have a multiplier effect on our economy. That painter could then have the money to spend on his own house. 

Now the idea is actually much bigger than that. The recent storm on the East Coast has exposed the vulnerability of our cities to calamity. Huge amounts of money needs to be spent to "fix" the problems that we did not see coming.

Global warming, rising sea levels have changed the game from "it would be nice", to "we NEED to go to work on it."

Take NYC. Seems that electrical grid is largely underground or in basements. Seemed like a good idea when it was conceived, but not so much now. Buildings all over need to think about moving things to the roof, or to the second floor, in order to protect themselves from being put out of business by a flood. In a million ways, our cities need to reinvent themselves to deal with the climate and to refresh themselves. The 100 year flood seems to be happening every 10 years. 

And so I understand that at one time, the initiative to build the interstate highway system was a great engine of prosperity. Lots of jobs, improved prospects for commerce, and sold lots of cars, too. Our economy managed to commit lots of money to this, but it did not put a product into someone's hand. But it improved our quality of life nonetheless.

Today, we know that the roads, the bridges, the infrastructure is badly in need of repair. I think this is the place that we will find the jobs to replace the manufacturing jobs that have gone away. And this is an example where global location matters. This has to happen on our terra firma. And this money that gets spent will circulate back into our economy.

It would be nice to see money spent to make our cities shiny and new and to find a way to take pride in that, and to enjoy that rather than to seek satisfaction in products made in China. 

The ramble is over, time to get moving. Your trinity of change is real enough. The solutions may not have enough scale to solve the nations problems. Too many people need work.

So my word for the future is "maintenance". Its local, cannot be digitized, and is largely not a commodity."

Related Essays:

  1. The Age of Indivisibility, and the Rise of Integrated Systems Design (GigaOM)
  2. Retail Needs a Reboot to Survive (GigaOM)
  3. HP, Dell and the Paradox of the Disrupted (GigaOM)
  4. Assessing the Internet: Great Creator or Better Destroyer (GigaOM)
  5. The Great Reset: Why Tomorrow May Not be Better than Today (O'Reilly)

November 09, 2012 in Economy, Local, Pattern Recognition, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

The Jobs Engine: On Indivisibility and Integrated Systems (GigaOM)

Broadband-Disrupter

There is a looming sense, a dark narrative that America’s best days are behind it. Why? A clash of civilizations. A sense in many pockets of the country that we are living in a time of anomie, inequity and worry.

Everywhere you look, there is disaster. At ground zero are the remnants of a 100-year flood known as the 2008 financial crisis; it’s a flood that never completely receded.

Put another way, whether you are politically right or left, believe in trickle down or trickle up,  the hard truth is that there are few catalysts for significant job growth in America right now.

Take a look at that one great wonder and power of our age, broadband internet. In many ways it has been an engine of growth and created whole new industries. Yet it has also set off a wave of painful disruption, through the triumvirate forces of:

  • Digitization: Anything that can be turned into bits, will be.
  • Globalization: Where location can be rendered moot, it will be.
  • Commoditization: When bits and logistics can commoditize, they will.

In its wake it has permanently broken or even destroyed multiple industries. In fact, Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows quite clearly how such industries that were rocking and rolling prior to broadband are now sucking wind, including electronics stores, book stores, electronic components, employment services and information services, to name a few.

Less obvious, but equally troubling, is the fact that when these industries break it also disrupts the ecosystems that surround them as well, cascading in a domino effect. 

Here’s how it works: When an industry like print media goes sideways, not only do publishers and the employees housed within them go away, but so too do printers, production houses, delivery trucks, book stores, newsstands, book reviewers, sales reps and publicists. Worse, this hits regional hubs especially hard. And we now know those jobs are not coming back. Ever.

The immutability of this dynamic hearkens to a signature line in Oliver Stone’s ever timely, ‘Wall Street,‘ when broken trader Bud Fox (Charlie Sheen) asks corporate raider Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas), “Why do you need to wreck this company?” Gekko retorts, “Because it’s wreckable, all right?”

Read the full post HERE.

UPDATE 1: Kevin Kelly, author of 'What Technology Wants' (one of the more thought-provoking books of recent years), and long time Wired writer, has written an excellent article on what he calls 'The Post-Productive Economy.' Most fundamentally, he argues that sustaining growth waves take decades to reach full bloom, yet our measures are tailored to both the wrong kinds of metrics and the wrong sense of periodicity. I think that it further underscores the truth that the strongest counters to Commoditization, Digitization and De-Localization is Integration.

Related:

  1. Retail Needs a Reboot to Survive (GigaOM)
  2. HP, Dell and the Paradox of the Disrupted (GigaOM)
  3. Assessing the Internet: Great Creator or Better Destroyer (GigaOM)
  4. The Great Reset: Why Tomorrow May Not be Better than Today

November 05, 2012 in Coaching, Design, Economy, Metrics, Pattern Recognition, Policy, Post-PC, Streams and Nuggets | Permalink | 0 Comments | TrackBack (0)

« Previous | Next »

FIRST-TIME VISITOR?

FOLLOW MY TWEETS

READ MY COLUMN

PLAY AND LEARN WITH WALLACE

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    WHAT I'M READING

    • Grantland
    • Fred Wilson (A VC)
    • kottke.org
    • AppleInsider
    • Daring Fireball
    • Felix Salmon
    • Forum Blue and Gold (Lakers)
    • GigaOM

    Recent Posts

    • American Exceptionalism: Dancing on the Razor's Edge
    • It’s a Madhouse: Thoughts on Gun Reform and Being Serious about Real Problems
    • Life Lessons: Always Be Teaching
    • Find Your Purpose
    • Ruminations on The Fountainhead vs. Atlas Shrugged: When Does Personal Integrity Become Narcissism and Sociopathy?
    • Ruminations on the Test Drive: If you want to see how it ENDS, look at how it BEGINS
    • Ruminations on Curiosity
    • Understanding the "Vampires" Among Us
    • On Bias, False Dichotomies (and other Four Letter Words)
    • Two of the biggest truths about understanding the power of Incentives

    Archives

    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021

    More...

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Subscribe in a reader
    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 07/2005